2009/48/EC公布好久了，大家有看到关于它里面玩具定义修改后的guideline吗，大家都认为玩具定义修改后范围扩大了，到底扩大到什么范围呢，2009/48/EC的解释里面讲的也很模糊，现引用解释如下：
This Directive shall apply to products designed or intended, whether or not exclusively,
for use in play by children under 14 years of age (hereinafter referred to as "toys").
Article 2 (1) defines the scope of the Directive, that is the products to which it applies.
The definition in article 2 (1), first subparagraph, provides the following criteria for
deciding whether a product falls under the scope of the Directive:
? Any product or material designed or intended
? whether or not exclusively
? for use in play
? by children under 14 years of age.
The wording of this provision is slightly different than the definition in the 88/378/EEC
Directive. However, the intention has only been to codify the practise under that
Directive, and not to change the material scope of the Directive from what it has been up
till now. The words “whether or not exclusively” have been added to the definition to
indicate that the product does not have to be exclusively intended for playing purposes in
order for it to be considered as a toy, but it can have other functions as well. For
example, a key-ring with a teddy bear attached to it is considered as a toy, or a sleeping
bag in the shape of a soft filled toy. It was not the intention to imply that the standard for
trampolines for instance needs to take into account adults using the toy-trampoline. Other
examples of products with double function (door decorations, soft filled animal shaped
purses or backpacks,…) can be found in guidance document 11 on classification of toys
intended for children above or under 36 months.
个人认为上面几款算玩具，行李牌比较可爱小孩子可能会玩；眼镜吸管很新奇，小孩子也会去玩。大家认为呢？
|
发表于 2011-8-24 21:12:55
收藏
楼主
